Wednesday, September 11, 2002

 

http://www.marketplace.org/shows/2002/09/11_mpp.html

 

Value of a Life - Part Two

 

There are, of course, alternatives to the fund, and those alternatives include the wrongful death lawsuit. We talk with law professor and historian Tom Russell about the history of the wrongful death lawsuit in the American legal system. And, Marketplace contributor Adam Davidson talks about his experiences with insurance adjusters, and how much his life would be worth in a settlement. Then, economists try their hand at coming up with precise calculations for the value of a life, but with a different purpose in mind. James Hammitt, professor of Economics and Decision Sciences at the Harvard School of Public Health, discusses how an economist might come up with a dollar value. David Salvo, who lost his father in the Sept. 11th attack on the World Trade Center, weighs in with a testimonial on the priceless nature of what his family has lost. And, from Trinity Church on Wall Street, Reverend Daniel Matthews talks about why we feel the need to come up with a specific amount at all -- and what it means, morally.

 

AUDIO:

 

MP: Legal historian Thomas Russell says that the tradition that guides this valuation is not even as old as the U.S. Constitution.

 

TR: In the early 19th century, if you were injured and that led to you death, then the law provided you with no compensation. Law's answer was, 'How about nothing.'

 

MP: Because the dead can't sue?

 

TR: In the early 19th century, yes, that was true. When you died, any lawsuit that you had died with you.

 

MP: And how did that start to evolve?

 

TR: One thing that you can see is that that provides a real benefit to the people who do the injuring. It becomes cheaper when the people who are injured actually die. Later in the 19th century and in the early 20th century, the legal rules begin to change. The first shift in the late in the 19th and early 20th century was something called survival statutes. A survival statute allowed a lawsuit to continue even after the plaintiff had died. The second type of statute were wrongful death statutes - these allowed widows, widowers and children to file lawsuits for the loss of a close family member. Initially wrongful death statutes provided for recovery of pecuniary losses. And that was wages very narrowly conceived. Think about the pay envelope that the worker got, he might make it his habit to spend some money on hobbies, sports or say at the saloon or the racetrack. The actual amount of money that the worker brought into the household would be something that the household could try to recover.

 

MP: It's real take home pay.

 

TR: Exactly. With time, law starts to value other services that a decedent provided to the household - mowing the lawn, painting the house - those sorts of things, which economists could value, begin to become the subject for compensation. The final step comes later in the 20th century when, in wrongful death cases, law begins to value the lost relationship that the family has suffered when someone has died