| Tony Gallagher |
 |
| The Man: DU's Neil Krauss is
cracking down on off-campus parties.
|
|
| |
As
final exams wrap up the fall quarter this week at the University of
Denver, neighbors are breathing a collective sigh of relief. The
year-round residents are ready for a break from the town-versus-gown
clash with rowdy college students, a common occurrence at campuses
across the country.
"I think that the students who live off-campus right now are
probably one of the worst groups of neighbors that we've seen in
quite some time," says University Park Community Council president
Andi Malard, who has lived just east of DU for ten years and has
called the police four times already this year. "It's like
five-year-olds turned loose in a toy store: They run down the street
screaming their heads off. It's really sad, but they just don't pay
attention to the law."
But for the first time, the university is taking a stand, in part
to appease neighbors. This fall, DU teamed up with the Denver Police
Department to crack down on off-campus partying, imposing sanctions
for violating the Student Code of Conduct at off-campus events --
whether for drinking at a nearby bar or for throwing a backyard
kegger.
"It's the first time that we're taking official action," says Dan
Kast, DU's director of citizenship and community standards. "It
isn't so much that we suddenly want to get students in trouble; it's
more that we've made the decision that we shouldn't turn a blind eye
to things that happen two blocks away or in downtown Denver."
In mid-September, DU sent a letter to neighbors and its 9,000
students outlining the new policy and asking them to "please keep
the music down, especially after 10 p.m." Then Denver police held
three undercover operations -- a program that District Three's
Sergeant Johnny Martinez likes to call the "DU Party Disturbance
Patrol" -- to bust underage drinking at popular DU bars, liquor
stores and house parties. They issued about forty citations over
three nights, compared with the 100 issued during the entire
2002-2003 school year.
"I don't want to give you the impression that DU students are out
of control," Martinez says. "It's not worse than in past years;
we're just taking a different approach. We felt that if we asserted
more control of the situation at the beginning of the year -- be
proactive instead of reactive -- that it will send a message to the
students."
Under the new policy, students' first off-campus violations are
met with a warning letter from DU's lawyers; the letter is copied to
their landlords if the incident involves private property. With the
second offense, students can be placed on probation; the third could
result in suspension or even expulsion. So far this year, eleven DU
students have been suspended -- all for on-campus infractions -- but
none have been expelled, although at least six students at two
separate private residences have been evicted by landlords.
That process can take as little as thirteen days to complete and
is dependent upon how each individual lease is written, according to
Craig Joyce, a Denver lawyer who specializes in tenant-landlord
disputes. For example, many landlords include language that requires
tenants to abide by all local laws -- and noise violations, brought
to landlords' attention by DU, could constitute grounds for
eviction.
"I think most of our students are very well-behaved," says Neil
Krauss, DU's assistant vice chancellor for business affairs and
neighborhood liaison, who spearheaded the new campaign. "We know
when the worst times of the year are; they're predictable. It's a
fact of life that at the beginning and end of every quarter,
students are going to party, let loose. Sadly, we have to set
examples."
In DU law professor Tom Russell's experience, however, those
examples don't always work. He lived on Boulder's infamous Hill when
the University of Colorado implemented a similar alcohol policy
after a slew of student riots three years ago, but Russell found
that the program didn't make much of a difference. "Obviously, the
size of the university does matter, but my impression is that our
students are very different. CU is clearly a party school, and a
large number of students go to the school solely for that reason,"
he says. "The city and citizens of Boulder tolerate disorder and
lawlessness in a way that the people of Denver do not.
"Part of the University of Denver's mission is to be a private
university in the public interest," he adds. "I regard it as a
responsible act by this university to get involved in students'
off-campus lives."
Senior Mitch Goldman learned about the new policy the hard way.
In early September, the police broke up the second party that
Goldman and his roommates had held at their off-campus house in one
week. He figured it was no big deal -- until his first warning
letter arrived.
"We were totally surprised," Goldman says. "It was a very serious
letter. And it totally shut us up -- we haven't had a party since.
But I don't really understand how the university can step in and
tell me that I can't have a party. It's totally annoying."
Krauss has even dropped by problem students' houses to chat and
has forced violators to write letters of apology to their neighbors.
"I tell them the truth, which is that nobody wants to invade their
privacy; they just need to quiet down," he says. "And they're cool
with it. Someday they'll have a house and a family, and they'll
recognize that there is another side to this story."
For now, though, a majority of the private-university students
agree with Goldman, according to senior Bryan Villano, who
represents off-campus students on DU's All Undergraduate Student
Association Senate. "Students consider DU to be their own little
golden bubble; they feel like this is their area to do whatever they
want with."
But while students may complain, Russell says there is no legal
precedent stopping the policy. "The university has the right to take
an interest when it comes to crimes committed by its students or
faculty," he says. "Say a bunch of students are running an
off-campus methamphetamine lab or running around raping students. I
think that the university would be interested in knowing about
that."
And DU's Code of Student Conduct explicitly states that the
school has jurisdiction off campus. "The standards of conduct
primarily prohibit misconduct on University premises...but may
address off-campus conduct when the behavior shows, in the
University's sole judgement, that the student may threaten the
welfare and safety of the University community," the document reads.
Residents on both sides of the ivy wall agree that more
after-hours on-campus student programming could help to curb
disturbances in the community. "Two or three years ago, there were
lots of parties to go to every night on campus, but now the
university has hired the police to bust 'em up," Villano says. "The
students feel like there is nothing to do. Why can't the university
give us a place to hang out?"
In response, DU recently applied to the Colorado Liquor
Enforcement Division for a full liquor license in Sidelines Pub, a
3.2-beer bar in the Driscoll University Center. "Student programming
is a major challenge for us," Krauss admits. "I think it's a great
idea to have more of a campus community. The kids just want
something to do."
Until that happens, students are just taking the party farther
down the street.
"People aren't drinking less; they're just drinking and driving
to bars and parties farther away because DU's party scene is totally
getting shut down," Goldman says. "It worked better the old way."
| Copyright Westword. 2003. Originally published: November 20, 2003
| - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
|